<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3859">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3859</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3880" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3879" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3861" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-03T20:58:20Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3880">
    <title>Jurnal Internasional</title>
    <link>http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3880</link>
    <description>Title: Jurnal Internasional
Authors: Harahap, Herlina Hanum; Syah, Danial
Abstract: The term of Building Use Rights on Management Rights was initially for 50 years in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960 but with the existence of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 to five 5 years. This clearly results in the issue of legal uncertainty for holders of Building Use Rights over Management Rights. The method used is normative juridical, the results of research obtained based on the analysis carried out can be seen that so far the arrangement for extension of Building Use Rights over Management Rights cannot be separated from the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960, namely 30 years which can be extended with an approved for 20 years, with the provision of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property, it has clearly changed the length of time granting Building Use Rights over Management Rights, namely for five years which can be extended with government approval. The provisions of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property have resulted in legal certainty issues and can harm the holders of Building Use Rights above management rights so that it is clear that the provisions including Verordnung &amp; Autonome Satzung have contradicted the provisions.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3879">
    <title>Jurnal Internasional</title>
    <link>http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3879</link>
    <description>Title: Jurnal Internasional
Authors: Hayaty, Sri Rizki; Iskandar, Dedi; Purba, Nelvitia
Abstract: Jurispudence is a customary carried out by judges to follow the verdict of judges who have the power of&#xD;
law to exist for the same case. The high court’s decision is considered to contain the main points of&#xD;
thought about legal issues that occur in the community. Jurisprudence is the decisions of judges made by&#xD;
courts that already have a fixed legal force on the case that is handled based on the decision of the&#xD;
previous judge on the same case and this is justified by the Supreme Court (SC) as the Court of Cassation,&#xD;
or the Supreme Court itself which already has permanent legal force. So here the judge not only applies&#xD;
the law, but the judge can also and is able to form a law (judge made law). Especially if the rules&#xD;
contained in the law are unclear, or the existing laws are not in accordance with the current circumstances&#xD;
and the law does not regulate the problems at hand. Research methods in this writing was to use&#xD;
normative methods or literature studies where this research was to use various secondary data such as&#xD;
laws and regulations, court decisions, legal theories, and could be the opinions of scholars. It can be&#xD;
argued that this jurisprudence applies to the principle in law that judges should not refuse to adjudicate&#xD;
cases brought against it. Judges as law enforcement and justice are obliged to judge, follow and&#xD;
understand the legal values that live in society, then in handling cases judges can do: apply in concreto&#xD;
existing legal rules (in abstracto) and apply since before and seek for the rules of law based on legal&#xD;
values that live in society in the process of resolving cases that are handled.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-10-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3861">
    <title>Jurnal Internasional</title>
    <link>http://repository.umnaw.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/3861</link>
    <description>Title: Jurnal Internasional
Authors: Purba, Nelvitia; Sulistyawaty, Sri; Arfanti, Yulia
Abstract: Transparency Indonesia released Corruption Perception Index&#xD;
(CPI) in 2018 Indonesia in position 89 out of 180 countries, for the&#xD;
Asian region of Indonesia ranked 4th, ranked 3rd was Malaysia,&#xD;
ranked 2nd was Malaysia and rank -1 is Singapore. With this it is&#xD;
necessary to be more intensive in tackling corruption crimes in&#xD;
Indonesia. Related to the prevention of corruption in Educational&#xD;
Institutions, namely in Higher Education Institutions with Anti-&#xD;
Corruption Education starting in 2019, Entering the General Basic&#xD;
Course or entering the Ethics Course, this is a form of commitment&#xD;
for the Implementation of the Ministry of Research,&#xD;
Technology and Higher Education who signed the Col-laborative&#xD;
Agreement Against Cooperation And eradicating Corruption with&#xD;
the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The purpose of&#xD;
this research is to apply these anti-corruption values in daily life.&#xD;
Student involvement in ef-forts to eradicate Corruption certainly is&#xD;
not in enforcement efforts, because this is the authority of law&#xD;
enforcement officers. Students' active role is focused on efforts to&#xD;
prevent corruption by helping to build an anti-corruption culture in&#xD;
the community. This study uses a Research Method (R&amp;D). ). In this case, the research conducted only resulted in the Design&#xD;
of Anti-Corruption Education Learning Model De-sign Products&#xD;
Based on Film Analysis, and the design was validated internally&#xD;
(expert opinion). From the results of this study it can be stated&#xD;
that: (a) Film Analysis Model Design Learning Based on Anti-&#xD;
Corruption Education is an effort to better understand Anti-&#xD;
Corruption Education; (b) To foster student interest in more&#xD;
enthusiasm in Learning Anti-Corruption Education because it uses&#xD;
a fun Learning Model; (c) Increase the ability of students to&#xD;
analyze theo-ries of corruption crimes by applying to crimes that&#xD;
occur in the community through the media Learning Model with&#xD;
film screenings; and (d) To sharpen the ability of students in&#xD;
analyzing existing cases relating to corruption, so that it becomes&#xD;
a fortress for them to become reliable human beings not to&#xD;
Corruption.</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

